Search
Close this search box.
Search
Search

Consciousness and Inner Reality

In this thematic area we probe the investigation of the Western scientific community and of the contemplative traditions on the traces of the mental, revealing shared paths.
Perhaps no aspect of the mind is more familiar and at the same time puzzling than consciousness and our conscious experience of the self and the world. The problem of consciousness is probably the central question of the current theorization of the mind and at the same time the most conceptually delicate. In this place we document and comment on the research of the Western scientific community and of the contemplative traditions in an effort to understand what consciousness is and how it relates to other non-conscious aspects of reality.

Tutti gli articoli in Consciousness and Inner Reality

Consciousness and Inner Reality
Speaking of consciousness, existing models can be classified into two main categories: those that recognize to the Consciousness an intrinsic existence independent, at least in part, from its physical substratum and those who instead consider the Consciousness entirely reducible to the electro-chemical-physical processes that take place in the brain.
Bernard Stiegler's philosophical reflection on attention (2010; 2014) illustrates how attention is more than just concentration or vigilance. Attention also concerns desire, waiting, active participation, interest.
In this series of articles we discuss some of the key reflections of Bernard Stiegler's analysis on the link between digital technologies and the destruction of attention; on its consequences for individual and collective life.
Now that the Buddhist traditions confront themselves with cognitive neuroscience and other natural sciences, trying to build up or expand an edifice for studying the mind and conscious experience, it seems vital to stand for the legitimacy and self-sufficiency of Buddhist traditional thought, maintaining critical distance from the prestige (and thus privilege) the scientific apparatus holds in modern western society.
As described by linguist George Lackoff, a spatial metaphor (also orientational metaphor) is a conceptual metaphor in which the elements involved are spatially related to each other, i.e. they are respectively above or below, in or out, in front of or behind, in depth or on the surface, in the center or on the periphery, and so on.
The question we try to address here is: do we really understand what Buddhism is?